U.S. South Strong in Jobs, but the West Dominates in Real Estate
Tables 1 and 2 accompanying this article provide insight into the residential real estate markets in nearly all of America’s largest (by population) metropolitan statistics areas (MSAs). The raw data for 49 cities has been calculated by the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
For two cities that would normally be included in the analysis, Detroit and Pittsburgh, the NAR does not issue numbers.
Table 1 ranks the 49 MSAs according to first quarter 2018 median sales prices for ‘existing’ (i.e., not ‘new’) single-family homes. Table 2 places in order, from speediest to slowest, the percentage changes in median sales prices from Q1 2017 to Q1 2018, for the same 49 cities.
In a previous article, it was established that the best labor markets in the U.S. are currently in the South Region. This current article makes clear, however, that the search for the hottest residential real estate markets will lead one to look left on a map, to the West Region.
More of the following commentary will employ Table 1 as a reference point rather than Table 2, but we’ll begin with the latter nonetheless.
Table 2 shows that in the first quarter of 2018 there were year-over-year double-digit percentage price increases for resale single-family homes in 14 U.S. MSAs. The six top spots were all taken by cities in the West. California alone accounted for four super-sized price hikes, beginning with San Jose’s astonishing +28.3% performance. San Francisco (+12.5%), Los Angeles (+12.3%) and Sacramento (+11.0%) were also eye-catching.
Also in the West, there were ‘hot market’ year-over-year resale home contracts signed in Seattle, WA (+14.8%); Salt Lake City, UT (+13.1%); and Las Vegas, NV (+12.4%).
Completing the Top 14 in Table 2 were three cities in the South (Atlanta, GA and Jacksonville, FL, both at +11.9%, and Orlando, FL, +10.9%) and three in the Midwest (Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN +11.0%; Indianapolis, IN +10.6%; and Kansas City, MO +10.4%). The Northeast failed to break into the double-digit percentage-increase club, although Buffalo, NY fell just short at +9.9%.
As shown at the bottom of Table 2, Philadelphia, PA was the only major city in America to record an annual decline in its median resale single-family home price in this year’s Q1, -5.8%.
Turning to Table 1, which ranks cities according to their most recent resale price levels, the dominance of the West is asserted even more aggressively. Nine of the Top Dozen priciest resale homes markets in Q1 2018 were in the West Region. Cities in California took positions one through four – San Jose, $1.373 million; San Francisco, $917,000; San Diego, $610,000; and Los Angeles, $545,500.
The width of the space that has opened between San Jose and other American cities on the home price front has become enormous. Consider that resale homes in San Jose are presently half again as expensive as in second place San Francisco and more than double what prevails in third place San Diego.
Also among western cities in the Top Dozen for level of resale home prices are: Seattle, WA ($484,400 and +14.8% y/y); Denver, CO ($441,500 and +11.5% y/y); and Portland, OR ($384,800 and +6.9% y/y); plus, two more in California, Sacramento ($355,000 and +11.0% y/y) and Riverside ($350,000 and +7.7% y/y).
Rounding out the Top Dozen from regions other than the West are two urban centers in the Northeast (Boston, MA at $442,700 and +6.9% y/y and New York, NY at $389,700 and a modest +1.0% y/y) and one in the South (Washington, DC at $394,400 and +2.8% y/y).
Despite ongoing net in-migration of individuals and families, driven by decent employment prospects and the warmer climate, resale home prices remain surprisingly restrained in the U.S. South Region.
Among the four major cities in Texas, Austin ($296,400 and +4.5% y/y) is the price leader followed by Dallas-Ft. Worth ($250,700 and +6.0% y/y), Houston ($229,800 and +3.4% y/y) and San Antonio ($218,900 and +8.0% y/y).
In Florida, the ordering on the resale home price scale is Miami ($340,000 and +6.9% y/y) ahead of Orlando ($255,000 and +10.9% y/y), Jacksonville ($240,500 and +11.9% y/y) and Tampa ($225,000 and +8.4%).
At the bottom of Table 1’s existing single-family homes median price ranking, four of the five MSAs are either in Ohio (Cincinnati, $157,300 and +8.2% y/y; Cleveland, $133,500 and +5.9% y/y) or New York (Buffalo, $138,400 and +9.9%; Rochester, $131,500 and +2.3% y/y).
table 1: RANKING OF MAJOR U.S. CITIES
table 2: RANKING OF MAJOR U.S. CITIES
BY MEDIAN SALES PRICE,
BY CHANGE IN MEDIAN SALES PRICE,
EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
Firtst Quarter (Q1) 2018
Q1 2018 vs Q1 2017
|1||San Jose, CA||$1,373,000||1||San Jose, CA||28.3%|
|2||San Francisco, CA||$917,000||2||Seattle, WA||14.8%|
|3||San Diego, CA||$610,000||3||Salt Lake City, UT||13.1%|
|4||Los Angeles, CA||$545,500||4||San Francisco, CA||12.5%|
|5||Seattle, WA||$484,400||5||Las Vegas, NV||12.4%|
|6||Boston, MA||$442,700||6||Los Angeles, CA||12.3%|
|7||Denver, CO||$441,500||7||Atlanta, GA||11.9%|
|8||Washington, DC||$394,400||7||Jacksonville, FL||11.9%|
|9||New York, NY||$389,700||9||Denver, CO||11.5%|
|10||Portland, OR||$384,800||10||Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN||11.0%|
|11||Sacramento, CA||$355,000||10||Sacramento, CA||11.0%|
|12||Riverside, CA||$350,000||12||Orlando, FL||10.9%|
|13||Miami, FL||$340,000||13||Indianapolis, IN||10.6%|
|14||Salt Lake City, UT||$322,000||14||Kansas City, MO||10.4%|
|15||Austin, TX||$296,400||15||Buffalo, NY||9.9%|
|16||Raleigh, NC||$274,300||16||Phoenix, AZ||9.8%|
|17||Las Vegas, NV||$270,200||17||Raleigh, NC||9.6%|
|18||Providence, RI||$269,800||18||Memphis, TN||9.5%|
|19||Phoenix, AZ||$261,100||19||Nashville, TN||8.7%|
|20||Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN||$260,400||20||Columbus, OH||8.4%|
|21||Orlando, FL||$255,000||20||Tampa, FL||8.4%|
|22||Baltimore, MD||$253,700||22||Cincinnati, OH||8.2%|
|23||Richmond, VA||$253,000||22||San Diego, CA||8.2%|
|24||Nashville, TN||$252,300||24||Louisville, KY||8.1%|
|25||Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX||$250,700||25||Charlotte, NC||8.0%|
|26||Chicago, IL||$242,100||25||San Antonio, TX||8.0%|
|27||Jacksonville, FL||$240,500||27||Richmond, VA||7.8%|
|28||Houston, TX||$229,800||28||Riverside, CA||7.7%|
|29||Charlotte, NC||$226,400||29||Boston, MA||6.9%|
|30||Milwaukee, WI||$226,200||29||Miami, FL||6.9%|
|31||Tampa, FL||$225,000||29||Portland, OR||6.9%|
|32||Hartford, CT||$221,600||32||Baltimore, MD||6.8%|
|33||San Antonio, TX||$218,900||33||Hartford, CT||6.5%|
|34||Virginia Beach, VA||$218,000||34||Birmingham, AL||6.0%|
|35||Atlanta, GA||$204,500||34||Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX||6.0%|
|36||Kansas City, MO||$197,700||36||Chicago, IL||5.9%|
|37||Philadelphia, PA||$196,900||36||Cleveland, OH||5.9%|
|38||New Orleans, LA||$195,500||38||Virginia Beach, VA||5.6%|
|39||Birmingham, AL||$193,900||39||New Orleans, LA||4.9%|
|40||Columbus, OH||$185,100||40||St. Louis, MO||4.8%|
|41||Indianapolis, IN||$176,100||41||Austin, TX||4.5%|
|42||Louisville, KY||$170,400||42||Providence, RI||3.5%|
|43||Memphis, TN||$164,300||43||Houston, TX||3.4%|
|44||St. Louis, MO||$162,400||44||Washington, DC||2.8%|
|45||Cincinnati, OH||$157,300||45||Milwaukee, WI||2.4%|
|46||Oklahoma City, OK||$147,600||46||Rochester, NY||2.3%|
|47||Buffalo, NY||$138,400||47||Oklahoma City, OK||1.9%|
|48||Cleveland, OH||$133,500||48||New York, NY||1.0%|
|49||Rochester, NY||$131,500||49||Philadelphia, PA||-5.8%|
Figures are not seasonally adjusted (NSA).